Key insights
- An analysis of BOXABL's SPAC merger structure reveals significant liquidity constraints for preferred shareholders. The structure converts preferred shares to common stock gradually over 14 months post-merger, with only converted shares becoming tradable. This phased liquidity, combined with historical poor performance of de-SPAC companies, suggests a potentially unfavorable risk-reward profile for these investors, implying downward pressure on the stock if early investors seek

NOTE: I'm reposting to this community since the Founder of BOXABL removed my post in that sub.
I’m a crowdfunding preferred shareholder [of BOXABL, BOXB / FGMC] trying to sanity-check the economics here.
Let’s use a simplified example:
- Assume you own 10,000 BOXABL preferred shares * Assume internal economic value = $0.80/share * Total economic value = $8,000 * Merger reference price = $10/share
So your public-equivalent math becomes:
10,000 × $0.80 = $8,000
Then:
$8,000 ÷ $10 = 800 BXBL shares
Not 10,000 public shares.
That part is actually fine. That’s just recapitalization math.
The insane part is the liquidity structure.
Per BOXABL’s SEC FAQ:
- Preferred stock is NOT listed * Preferred stock is NOT tradable * ~14 months after closing, 20% converts to common * Then another 20% per month * Only converted common becomes tradable
Assume merger closes mid-June 2026.
That means:
|Date|Tradable Shares|Locked Shares| |:-|:-|:-| |Jun 2026|0|800| |Aug 2027|160|640| |Sep 2027|320|480| |Oct 2027|480|320| |Nov 2027|640|160| |Dec 2027|800|0|
So let’s model outcomes.
Scenario 1: Price stays flat at $10
Best-case stable market fantasy.
|Unlock Date|Shares|Price|Value| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |Aug 2027|160|$10|$1,600| |Sep 2027|160|$10|$1,600| |Oct 2027|160|$10|$1,600| |Nov 2027|160|$10|$1,600| |Dec 2027|160|$10|$1,600|
Total = $8,000
You break even.
Scenario 2: Price grows 10% annually
Optimistic growth case.
June 2026 → Aug 2027 ≈ 14 months
$10 × (1.10)^(14/12) ≈ $11.18
Approx unlock values:
|Date|Price|Shares|Value| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |Aug 2027|$11.18|160|$1,789| |Sep 2027|$11.27|160|$1,803| |Oct 2027|$11.36|160|$1,818| |Nov 2027|$11.45|160|$1,832| |Dec 2027|$11.54|160|$1,846|
Total ≈ $9,088
Gain ≈ 13.6%
Over 18 months.
Not exactly moonshot.
Scenario 3: Average de-SPAC performance
Historically, many de-SPACs perform terribly after merger (median long-term returns have generally been poor vs IPO benchmarks; exact averages vary by cohort/provider).
Let’s use a simplified ugly-but-plausible path:
- Close at $10 * Month 6 = $6 * Month 12 = $3 * Month 14 = $2 * Month 18 = $1.50
Then:
|Unlock Date|Price|Shares|Value| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |Aug 2027|$2.00|160|$320| |Sep 2027|$1.90|160|$304| |Oct 2027|$1.75|160|$280| |Nov 2027|$1.60|160|$256| |Dec 2027|$1.50|160|$240|
Total = $1,400
From original $8,000 economic value.
-82.5%
The actual concern
This isn’t about whether BOXABL succeeds as a company.
It’s about structure.
Public FGMC/BXBL investors get immediate liquidity.
Crowdfunding preferred investors absorb:
- recap dilution * no liquidity at closing * delayed conversion * market risk while trapped
So the question:
Is this actually shareholder-friendly, or are retail preferred investors effectively exit liquidity with a time bomb attached?