Can someone explain the investment thesis behind space stocks?

REDDIT.COMMay 26, 6:02 PM UTC

Key insights

  • The post questions the investment thesis behind space stocks like ASTS, RKLB, and LUNR, citing a lack of profitability and revenue compared to tech giants. It anticipates a post-SPACEX IPO drop due to overvaluation. This reflects concerns about speculative investment in the space sector, potentially leading to a correction in related stocks. However, the overall impact on US equities is limited.
Can someone explain the investment thesis behind space stocks?

Hey all,

First time posting, I have done quite well over the last year jumping on GOOG, AMD, ARM and NVIDIA, and I have pivoted more into MU, DRAM and SNDK. I have seen lots of space stocks blow up which I partly think is due to the upcoming SPACEX IPO. However, I really don't understand why companies like ASTS, RKLB, and LUNR have been blowing up so much -they aren't hugely profitable companies. They don't have insane revenues like AMD or MU to back up their share prices. Can someone explain to me please why they are so popular, other than hype? Also, are we close to their peak, or is there still lots of room to grow on these stocks. I am fully expecting SPACEX IPO to drastically drop after about a month as I cannot see the justification behind these crazy valuations.

Thanks for your help! Sincerely, a guy who just wants to understand and who is thinking offloading his laggards (MSFT and META).

Continue reading on REDDIT.COM

Related Articles