Key insights
- Oracle has issued a force majeure notice on its 'Project Jupiter' data center in New Mexico due to local opposition and regulatory setbacks, potentially suspending payments if the facility misses its 2028 launch. This move caused Oracle shares to fall 4%, Blue Owl Capital (developer's owner) shares to drop 4%, and Bloom Energy shares to tumble 6%, highlighting the risks associated with large-scale AI infrastructure projects facing environmental and regulatory hurdles.

Investing.com -- According to a recent report from Bloomberg, Oracle Corp. is moving to shield itself from mounting financial liabilities tied to its massive artificial intelligence data center in New Mexico. Facing fierce local opposition and regulatory setbacks, the tech giant has issued a force majeure notice to the project’s developer, a unit of Blue Owl Capital Inc., in an attempt to suspend payments should the facility fail to meet its 2028 launch date.
The maneuver, detailed by Bloomberg, highlights the escalating friction between the booming demand for AI infrastructure and local environmental realities, sending ripples across the market and directly impacting Oracle’s key technology partners.
The report triggered a swift sell-off among the companies anchored to the New Mexico project:
Oracle Corp.: Shares fell 4% as investors weighed the potential delays and the underlying risk to its ambitious AI capacity rollout.
Blue Owl Capital Inc.: The alternative asset manager, which owns the project’s developer Stack Infrastructure, saw its stock drop 4%.
Bloom Energy: Shares tumbled 6%, reflecting the outsized role the alternative power provider was expected to play in keeping the massive campus online.
Dubbed "Project Jupiter," the southern New Mexico campus is a cornerstone of the broader Stargate AI infrastructure build-out. The initiative was unveiled with great fanfare by President Donald Trump alongside leaders from Oracle, OpenAI, and SoftBank Group, touted as an unprecedented investment in American tech dominance.
Designed to handle a staggering 2.45 gigawatts of power—enough to supply roughly 1.8 million homes—Project Jupiter represents the extreme scale required by modern AI workloads. However, almost two years after its conceptual launch, the $165 billion project has collided with the harsh realities of resource management in an arid region.
Bloom Energy’s 6% stock drop reflects its heavy reliance on Project Jupiter. Oracle partnered with Bloom to power the 2.45-gigawatt campus using solid oxide fuel cells. Because these cells generate electricity electrochemically, they require minimal water—a crucial advantage for operating a massive data center in New Mexico’s arid climate.
Despite solving the water issue, Bloom’s fuel cells require a steady supply of natural gas to operate. This requirement has become Project Jupiter’s Achilles’ heel.
The project relies on the construction of a 17-mile natural gas pipeline known as the "Green Chile Project," operated by Energy Transfer LP. However, the pipeline has been delayed from its original August 2026 target to February 2027, following repeated denials by the New Mexico State Land Office for right-of-way permits across state trust lands. The state’s Commissioner of Public Lands and local environmental groups have argued the project poses climate risks and strains local resources.
Without the pipeline, the Bloom Energy fuel cells cannot operate, leaving the mega-campus effectively stranded without a viable power source.
Companies typically invoke force majeure to freeze contractual obligations when an unforeseen, unavoidable event disrupts a project. While Oracle claims it is utilizing the clause as a precautionary measure and insists that "Project Jupiter remains on our planned schedule", the legal posturing signals serious concern over the project’s viability.
Even if Oracle succeeds in winning some financial wiggle room from Blue Owl, the standoff threatens to alarm the lenders backing the infrastructure build. More broadly, Project Jupiter is rapidly becoming a symbol of the growing political and environmental backlash against the AI data center boom—proving that securing capital and computing chips is only half the battle in the era of artificial intelligence.